A Systematic Review of the Survival and Complication Rates
Based on the present systematic review all-ceramic crowns when used for anterior teeth showed survival rates at 5 years comparable to those seen for metal-ceramic crowns. When used for posterior teeth the survival rates at 5 years of densely sintered alumina crowns (94.9 ) and reinforced glass-c This site needs JavaScript to work properly.
Get PriceA Systematic Review of the Survival and Complication Rates
Based on the present systematic review all-ceramic crowns when used for anterior teeth showed survival rates at 5 years comparable to those seen for metal-ceramic crowns. When used for posterior teeth the survival rates at 5 years of densely sintered alumina crowns (94.9 ) and reinforced glass-c This site needs JavaScript to work properly.
Get PriceLIST OF PRIMARY STUDIES IN THE INCLUDED SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
Study objective was to evaluate the clinical survival rates of Zirconia all-ceramic single crowns on anterior and posterior teeth and to compare them with metal ceramic crowns Nineteen studies were includedCehreli et al. 2009Beuer et al. 2010Cheung et al. 1991Nilson et al. 1994Martin et al. 1997Walton et al. 1999Marklund et al. 2003Reitemeier
Get PriceA systematic review of the performance of ceramic
OBJECTIVES The objective of this systematic review was to assess the 5-year survival rates and incidences of complications associated with ceramic abutments and to compare them with those of metal abutments. METHODS An electronic Medline search complemented by manual searching was conducted to identify randomized-controlled clinical trials and prospective and retrospective studies providing
Get PriceAll-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental
the outcomes of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic FDPs i.e. of single crowns and of multiple-unit FDPs and to assess whether or not all-ceramic FDPs achieve similar long-term results as FDPs made out of metal-ceramics. The objectives of this systematic review therefore were (1) To update the previous systematic review 1 on tooth-supported
Get PriceClinical outcomes of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic
Review of the clinical survival of CAD/CAM crowns Introduction The advance of digital dentistry and a high demand for metal-free restorations have led to rapid evolution in processing technologies as well as to the develop-ment of newer restorative materials. Several clinical studies have demonstrated that all-ceramic crowns
Get PriceA systematic review of the survival and complication rates
Conclusion Based on the present systematic review all‐ceramic crowns when used for anterior teeth showed survival rates at 5 years comparable to those seen for metal–ceramic crowns.
Get PriceTooth Wear Against Ceramic Crowns in Posterior Region A
The objective of this systematic review was to assess tooth wear against ceramic crowns in posterior region in vitro and in vivo. An electronic PubMed search was conducted to identify studies on tooth wear against ceramic crowns in posterior region. The selected studies were analyzed in regard to ty
Get PriceClinical Performance SpringerLink
A systematic review of all-ceramic crowns clinical fracture rates in relation to restored tooth type. Int J Prosthodont. 201225 441–50. PubMed Google Scholar
Get PriceTooth Wear Against Ceramic Crowns in Posterior Region A
The objective of this systematic review was to assess tooth wear against ceramic crowns in posterior region in vitro and in vivo. An electronic PubMed search was conducted to identify studies on tooth wear against ceramic crowns in posterior region. The selected studies were analyzed in regard to ty
Get PriceFinish-line designs for ceramic crowns A systematic
Jul 01 2019 · The choice of a chamfer finish line in clinical practice appears to be better for ceramic crowns as restorations with chamfer finish lines exhibited better internal adaptation and comparable marginal adaptation than those with rounded shoulder finish lines.
Get PriceEndocrowns A systematic review Request PDF
Jan 04 2021 · Purpose The purpose of this systematic review was to determine whether endocrowns are a reliable alternative to post-retained restorations for
Get PriceFinish-line designs for ceramic crowns A systematic
Jul 01 2019 · The choice of a chamfer finish line in clinical practice appears to be better for ceramic crowns as restorations with chamfer finish lines exhibited better internal adaptation and comparable marginal adaptation than those with rounded shoulder finish lines.
Get PriceClinical Performance SpringerLink
A systematic review of all-ceramic crowns clinical fracture rates in relation to restored tooth type. Int J Prosthodont. 201225 441–50. PubMed Google Scholar
Get PriceFinish-line designs for ceramic crowns A systematic
Jul 01 2019 · The choice of a chamfer finish line in clinical practice appears to be better for ceramic crowns as restorations with chamfer finish lines exhibited better internal adaptation and comparable marginal adaptation than those with rounded shoulder finish lines.
Get Price(PDF) The clinical performance of all‐ceramic implant
Objective This review aimed at evaluating the survival and technical complication rates of all‐ceramic implant‐supported single crowns (SC). Material and Methods Three electronic databases were
Get PriceA systematic review and meta analysis of the longevity of
A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal–ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years Part I single crowns Pjetursson Clin.
Get PriceClinical Performance of Partial and Full-Coverage Fixed
of hybrid polymer and ceramic CAD/CAM materials. This present systematic review was performed in order to answer the PICO question defined as follows In patients receiving tooth-borne partial or full crowns are survival and clinical success rates of monolithic CAD/CAM restorations comparable to those of conventionally manufactured 2.
Get Price(PDF) Clinical trials in zirconia a systematic review
Conclusion1 Based on the limited short-term studies available zirconia can be said to be suitable for the fabrication of all-ceramic posterior single crowns long-span FPDs and implant abutments. 2 Inlay-retained FPDs cannot be recommended in light of published in vivo trials. 3 Chipping of the veneering porcelain is confirmed to be an ongoing
Get PriceThe clinical performance of all-ceramic implant-supported
The clinical performance of all-ceramic implant-supported single crowns A systematic review and meta-analysis All-ceramic implant-supported SCs showed-with the exception of a
Get PriceClinical Performance SpringerLink
A systematic review of all-ceramic crowns clinical fracture rates in relation to restored tooth type. Int J Prosthodont. 201225 441–50. PubMed Google Scholar
Get PriceClinical outcomes of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic
Review of the clinical survival of CAD/CAM crowns Introduction The advance of digital dentistry and a high demand for metal-free restorations have led to rapid evolution in processing technologies as well as to the develop-ment of newer restorative materials. Several clinical studies have demonstrated that all-ceramic crowns
Get PriceThe clinical performance of all-ceramic implant-supported
The clinical performance of all-ceramic implant-supported single crowns A systematic review and meta-analysis All-ceramic implant-supported SCs showed-with the exception of a
Get PriceA systematic review of all-ceramic crowns clinical
Purpose The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the clinical fracture incidence of tooth-supported all-ceramic crowns according to restored tooth type.
Get Price(PDF) A Systematic Review of All-Ceramic Crowns Clinical
The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the clinical fracture incidence of tooth-supported all-ceramic crowns according to restored tooth type.
Get PriceClinical Trials in Zirconia A Systematic Review Request PDF
The objective of this systematic review is to report on the clinical success of zirconia-based restorations fabricated by both milling processes in regard to framework fractures and veneering
Get PriceA systematic review of the survival and complication rates
Conclusion Based on the present systematic review all‐ceramic crowns when used for anterior teeth showed survival rates at 5 years comparable to those seen for metal–ceramic crowns.
Get PriceA systematic review of the survival and complication rates
OBJECTIVES The objective of this systematic review was to assess the 5-year survival rates of all-ceramic single crowns and to compare it with the survival rates of metal-ceramic crowns and to describe the incidence of biological and technical complications. METHODS An electronic Medline and Dental Global Publication Research System search complemented by manual searching was
Get PriceA systematic review of the 5-year survival and
on clinical and radiographic assessments and on the knowledge of the long-term Date Accepted 29 January 2007 To cite this article Jung RE Pjetursson BE Glauser R Zembic A Zwahlen M Lang NP. A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 19 2008 119–130
Get Price