GST on Director RemunerationA Detailed Analysis
May 12 2020 · M/s Maithan s Alloys Ltd vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax Bolpur in 22nd April 2019 Brahm Alloy Limited vs Commissioner of CGST C. Ex. Durgapur 2019 (Tri. Kalkata) Allied Blenders and Distillers Pvt Ltd Vs. CCE ST Aurangabad 2019 (Tri. Mumbai)
Get Price
Effective rates of Excise Duty for specified goods falling
ise Tariff Act as is in excess of the amount calculated at the rate specified in the corresponding entry in column (4) of the said Table and (b) from so much of the Special duty of excise leviable thereon under the Second Schedule hereinafter referred to as the Second Schedule) to the Central Exci
Get Price
Sec. 11BTime Limit to claim refund not applies to duty
The refund claim has been rejected on the ground that the refund claim was submitted beyond the period of limitation under Section 11B of Central Excise Act 1944. 2. The Ld. Chartered Accountant on behalf of the appellants submitted that in the cross-objection filed by them when the department filed appeal before the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals
Get Price
Central Excise law and rates of duty have been proposed
Dear Principal Chief Commissioner / Chief Commissioner / Principal Commissioner The Finance Minister has introduced the Finance Bill 2016 in Lok Sabha today i.e. 29th February 2016. Changes in Customs and Central Excise law and rates of duty have been proposed through the
Get Price
2016 (11) TMI 913
following judgments (i) Glass and Ceramic Decorators Vs. Commr. of C. Ex. Mumbai-I 2014 (305) E.L.T. 133 (Tri.-Mumbai) (ii) Essel Propack Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise Thane 2014 (314) E.L.T. 584 (Tri.-Mumbai) As regard the claim of drawback he submits that though the claim of drawback is of 98 in terms of Section 74 of the
Get Price
Maithan Ceramic Limited vs Commissioner Of Central Excise
Maithan Ceramic Limited vs Commissioner Of Central Excise on 19 July 2002. Equivalent citations 2002 (84) ECC 815. Hence the view taken by the West Regional Bench in the case of Ronak Dyeing Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise Mumbai-III 2001 (46) RLT 1065 (CEGAT-Mum.) is a correct view and any contrary view taken is not a correct law
Get Price
A. Bodaragama appointed as Commissioner-General of Excise
Jan 13 2020 · COLOMBO(News 1st)A. Bodaragama has been appointed as the new Excise Commissioner-General. Deputy Excise Commissioner Kapila Kumarasinghe stated thatGet the latest breaking news and top
Get Price
Collector of Central Excise New Delhi. Vs. Ballarpur
331F-H 332A-C Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax Board of Revenue v. Thomas Stephen Co. Ltd. JT 1988 1 SC 631 distinguished. Seshasayee Paper and Boards Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise 325 1985 22 ELT 163 Collector of Central Excise v. Eastend Paper Industries Ltd. 1989 43 ELT 201 SC Collector of Central Excise Nagpur v.
Get PriceHIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA SHILLONG
vs. the commissioner of central excise shillong v upadhyay s bharali s bhattacharjee m das t galati dr. n. mozika sr. adv. centralexciseap/2/2 019 the commissioner of central excise and service tax shillong vs. m/s bharti hexacom limited adv meghalaya
Get Price
Divisional Engineer Telecom vs Commissioner Of Customs
Maithan Ceramic Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Central Excise on 4 October 2001 as noted by CEGAT in their judgement in the case of TN Tobacco Co. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs Coimbatore reported in 1998 (28) RLT 73 (CEGAT) The findings recorded in paras 6 to 10 are reproduced below and also provides for limited
Get Price
COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER AND ANR. vs. MOHAN BREWARIES
Trans Asian Shipping Services (P) Ltd. (2016) 8 SCC 604 Signode India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise Customs-II (2017) 4 SCC 613 State of Tamil Nadu and Anr. v. India Cements Limited and Anr. (2011) 13 SCC 247 and Commissioner of Central Excise Bolpur v.
Get Price
GST on Director RemunerationA Detailed Analysis
May 12 2020 · M/s Maithan s Alloys Ltd vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax Bolpur in 22nd April 2019 Brahm Alloy Limited vs Commissioner of CGST C. Ex. Durgapur 2019 (Tri. Kalkata) Allied Blenders and Distillers Pvt Ltd Vs. CCE ST Aurangabad 2019 (Tri. Mumbai)
Get PriceCOMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER AND ANR. vs. MOHAN BREWARIES
Trans Asian Shipping Services (P) Ltd. (2016) 8 SCC 604 Signode India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise Customs-II (2017) 4 SCC 613 State of Tamil Nadu and Anr. v. India Cements Limited and Anr. (2011) 13 SCC 247 and Commissioner of Central Excise Bolpur v.
Get Price
Latest judgments on Service TaxService TaxTaxation
May 22 2009 · The India Cements Ltd. vs. CCE Salem 2007 TIOL 645 (CESTATMad.) held that Service Tax on the transport of goods can be paid out of CENVAT Credit and rejected the appeal of the Revenue. Commissioner of Central Excise Pune-1 vs. M/s. Thermax Ltd. 2007 TIOL 1819 (CESTATMum.) Import of Services. 48.
Get Price
GST Library
107 321GSTTaxpundit20 C.C.E. S.T.-Surat-ii Essar Steel Limited Tribunal Ahmedabad ST RAMESH NAIR JM Raju TM Excise Appeal No. 11518 of 2017-DB
Get Price
GST on Director s remunerationWhether payable
Apr 15 2020 · M/S. Brahm Alloy Limited V/s Commissioner Of CGST Central Excise Durgapur 2019 (4) TMI 1537CESTAT Kolkata M/S. Maithan Alloys Ltd. V/s CCE ST Bolpur 2019 (4) TMI 1595CESTAT Kolkata Given the above legal and judicial position the presence of the following factors would entail the existence of employer and employee relationship
Get Price
2016 (11) TMI 913
following judgments (i) Glass and Ceramic Decorators Vs. Commr. of C. Ex. Mumbai-I 2014 (305) E.L.T. 133 (Tri.-Mumbai) (ii) Essel Propack Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise Thane 2014 (314) E.L.T. 584 (Tri.-Mumbai) As regard the claim of drawback he submits that though the claim of drawback is of 98 in terms of Section 74 of the
Get PriceCentral Excise TariffFirst ScheduleSection Note
Central Excise TariffFirst ScheduleSection NoteCentral Excise. Showing 1 to 21 of 21 Records. 01. LIVE ANIMALS ANIMAL PRODUCTS (CHAPTER 1 to CHAPTER 5) 02. VEGETABLE PRODUCTS (CHAPTER 6 to CHAPTER 14) 03.
Get Price
Supreme Court Overruled CasesAdvocatetanmoy Law Library
Sep 26 2019 · M/s. Ballarpur Industries Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Collector of Customs and Central Excise and others AIR 1995 SC 1439 (1996) 53 ECC 1 (1995) 76 ELT 499 (1995) 3 SCC 429 Supp Collector of Central Excise Baroda Vs.
Get Price
separate legal entity India Judgments Law CaseMine
Government Ceramic Service Centre Cannanore v. Collector of Central Excise Cochin (CEGAT) to hold that the Mettur Dam unit is a separate legal entity from the Karikal unit of the818 that different units of a corporate entity will not make them separate legal entities for the purpose of leviability to service tax and when one renders
Get Price
DRI as Proper Officer under CustomsIs Canon Decision
Central Govt. amends Notification No. 11/2017- Central Excise so as to align it with amended Fourth Schedule to Central Excise Act w.e.f January 01 2020. Import Tariff value of Gold increased from USD 472/10 grams to USD 487/10 grams and that of silver increased from USD 544/ kilogram to USD 575/ kilogram Tariff values of 9 other i
Get Price
CBEC accepts 63 Orders of SC HC CESTAT for no further
Feb 16 2018 · 15.1 Department has accepted the order of the Hon ble Allahabad High Court dated 11.09.2014 passed in Central Excise Appeal No. 276/2006 in the case of Commissioner of Customs Central Excise Noida vs M/s Silver Oak Laboratories Pvt. Ors where the Hon ble High Court dismissed the Departmental Appeal holding that the submission of the
Get Price
Sub Reduction of Government litigationProviding
All Trade Commerce and concerned are hereby informed that the Central Board of Excise Customs Service Tax (CBEC) New Delhi vide their instructions issued from F. No. 390/Misc/163/2010-JC dated 17.12.2015 has fixed the following monetary limits
Get Price
Supreme Court Overruled CasesAdvocatetanmoy Law Library
Sep 26 2019 · M/s. Ballarpur Industries Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Collector of Customs and Central Excise and others AIR 1995 SC 1439 (1996) 53 ECC 1 (1995) 76 ELT 499 (1995) 3 SCC 429 Supp Collector of Central Excise Baroda Vs.
Get Price
The Recent Supreme Court Judgment in Canon India Key
1. Questions of law involved . A three-judge bench of the Hon ble Supreme Court passed a landmark decision in the case of Canon India Private Limited v.Commissioner of Customs Civil Appeal 827 of 2018 Canon India TS-75-SC-2021-CUST . The following
Get Price
Mark Auto Industries vs Cce on 15 September 2000
Maithan Ceramic Limited vs Commissioner Of Central Excise on 19 July 2002. Commissioner Of Central Excise vs Siddharth Tubes Ltd. on 2 April 2004. Reliance Telecom Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Customs on 8 June 2004. User Queries. bar of limitation. order is a speaking order. speaking order.
Get Price
GST on Director s remunerationWhether payable
Apr 15 2020 · M/S. Brahm Alloy Limited V/s Commissioner Of CGST Central Excise Durgapur 2019 (4) TMI 1537CESTAT Kolkata M/S. Maithan Alloys Ltd. V/s CCE ST Bolpur 2019 (4) TMI 1595CESTAT Kolkata Given the above legal and judicial position the presence of the following factors would entail the existence of employer and employee relationship
Get PriceCollector of Central Excise New Delhi. Vs. Ballarpur
331F-H 332A-C Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax Board of Revenue v. Thomas Stephen Co. Ltd. JT 1988 1 SC 631 distinguished. Seshasayee Paper and Boards Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise 325 1985 22 ELT 163 Collector of Central Excise v. Eastend Paper Industries Ltd. 1989 43 ELT 201 SC Collector of Central Excise Nagpur v.
Get Price
Effective rates of Excise Duty for specified goods falling
ise Tariff Act as is in excess of the amount calculated at the rate specified in the corresponding entry in column (4) of the said Table and (b) from so much of the Special duty of excise leviable thereon under the Second Schedule hereinafter referred to as the Second Schedule) to the Central Exci
Get Price
